Cavel International Shutdown Causes Abundance of Horses
Save Email Print
Updated: 5:54 PM Mar 26, 2008
Cavel International Shutdown Causes Abundance of Horses
Breeders say horses are now more difficult to sell, expensive to feed
Posted: 5:32 PM Mar 26, 2008
Reporter: Tina Stein
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Joanie Bugs Location: Illinois on Jun 24, 2009 at 01:39 PM

The only people that complain about horse slaughter are the ones that have NO clue about horses or taking care of horses. It is a total shame that Cavel closed. It is NO different than creamating a human being and no one complains about that. Get a grip on things. How about abortion. Look at how many human beings are aborted each year and it continues each year. How about a dog or cat. They get euthanized. Well, horses need to go somewhere. You can't even provide your own back yard for a burial ground for a horse. So, come on smart asses that want Cavel to remain closed. Tell the rest of us, if you are so smart, where are horses to go when they die naturally in your own back yard. I would like to know that answer to that one. Get a grit -- re-open Caval in DeKalb, Illinois -- so I can bury my horse.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Jay Location: NJ on Feb 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Ahh, the unintended consequences of laws a based solely on emotions instead of facts. The law is stupid, in many countries horse meat is eaten as often as cow meat. Our legislators have created a sacred cow out of the horse.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Anonymous on May 26, 2008 at 04:31 PM

I have an empty barn. I would love to have one or two of these unwanted horses. I would prefer not to go through a rescue becasue if im providing them a home the "adoption" fee's, which can be very high, can be better used to provide feed for them at my home. If anyone knows of a horse or pony that needs a home becasue owner cant keep any longer, please email me. I will give a horse or pony a great home.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Holly Location: ON on Apr 8, 2008 at 12:26 PM

If you don't have enough money to take care of the horses you have now, breeding is a very irresponsible thing to do. There will always be a market for horses who have good temperment, good confirmation, good training and good bloodlines. It is the people who breed the horses "to see what they get" who are causing the abundance. But, even if you have two purebred horses with everything previously mentioned, I would either find a buyer BEFORE breeding or decide to keep the foal yourself, and make sure you have enough $. It is the irresponsible breeders causing this-not the responsible ones.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Kate Richardson Location: Massachusetts on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:51 PM

Stop breeding altogether, so that you can afford to care for the horses you have now? Sheesh, what a concept. I am glad Ms Roddy has slowed down her breeding operation, but for the money she spends on one horse per month, the vet can humanely euthanize, and then, hey-presto! No more more monthly bills for that horse. Yearlings and two year olds going for forty cents a pound at auction is not the answer. Responsible ownership is.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Terri Location: Indiana on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:20 PM

Oh what a load of horse manure! Cavel did NOT supply a "public service". The only thing that they served was the foreign pockets with American dollars. Come on now!! Those who think that breeding horses is going to net them a good income need to get into another business because the economy won't support it. Slaughter houses promote irresponsible breeding practices and horse theft. How can that be good for the horses? This typical pro slaughter propaganda needs to end.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Terry Location: Ohio on Mar 29, 2008 at 06:29 PM

Mr. Bownman says that horses only were on the trucks for hours not days. The horses that came from Canada & Colorado to Cavel in ILL. were on the trucks more than a few hours. Horses have been shipped to Canada & Mexico for slaughter for years. Horse owners that can't afford to put their horse down are the ones that are irresponsible. No funding provided to those who take in horses that would of been slaughtered. HELLO it is the owners responsiblity to take care of that animal & dispose of it not the publics. And The Pres. of IHC needs to remind the public it is against the law to abuse/abandon/neglect your horse. A crime punishible by the law, misdomeaner in some states & felony in some states. Is the Pres. of IHC saying that if we don't have slaughter then we are about to see thousands of new criminals every year because the owners can't sell to slaughter. What kind of people are horse people? Potential Criminals if no slaughter? Better let the cops know to beef up the forces.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Rochell Location: Illinois on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Enough is enough! Did this person say anything about her own horses going to slaughter or to auction? NO she did not. Did any of the horses on this video look like they are in dier need of help? NO they did not. Does this person breed? Yes and it is her right. Yes cavell did close but do ANY of you people realize that slaughter in Mexico and canada is more inhumane than here in the states. How many of you are gonna cross the boarder to go save thoose horses? How many of you realize that the rising costs of hay isn't because all because of droughts the majority of the jump in cost is because of the economy. The gas and diesel prices are way up with the ethanol plants being built more farmers are planting corn and only keeping enough hay ground to keep their own animals fed. Then we have the access horses. If a person can not afford to feed a horse do you think they can afford to humanaly euthanize the horse? WAKE UP PEOPLE.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Joie Roddy Location: Sterling, IL on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:04 AM

Due to lack of space on this comment board, I have added a page to my website for my responses to many of the posts here regarding this story. Hopefully those of you who are so upset as to resort to name-calling and bashing without knowing *my* whole story will get some relief from the responses. Perhaps not. We can agree to disagree, then, and hopefully move on in order to productively work towards a common goal of handling the problem of unwanted horses in a humane and logical way. I believe that WIFR should be commended for covering the horse market at all, and any dialogue can be productive if it's directed and rational. Perhaps there will be further stories and follow-ups allowing for a more diverse range of opinions on problems and possible solutions. Thank you, Joie Roddy Sterling, IL http://www.four-leaf-farm.com/WIFRinterview.html
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Horseowner Location: Illinois on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:51 AM

Wake up people cavel likely was a better ending for a lot of the horses than starving because the owner didn't want to pay the vet. WOW you people read a lot into a story. What you dont know your making up. NICE I eat meat so I am not against slaughter.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Monica Location: New York on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:17 PM

Why doesn't she just stop breeding - the end.....
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Mila Location: Michigan on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:41 AM

Why the need for breeding when there are so many horses? As for Cavel? Thank God for humane people still living in the US. Greed will end up destroying what we profess to love so dear - our country and all its natural resources. Shame on us.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Kathy Location: Colorado on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:28 AM

Seems to me the problem is over breeding - stop the unnecessary breeding of horses if you don't intend to keep them for any purpose other than to see what you get. Geld your stallions and give your mares a break - enjoy the horses you already have and give them a cushy, comfortable life instead of one that is destined for slaughter. Just like kids - breed what you can afford to care for for life. Slaughter is not and should not be a method of birth control.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Ann Location: KS on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:47 AM

It is easy to point fingers and make judgements. Yet, 'but for the grace of God, there go I.' A drought...loss of a job... and one might find oneself with no way to keep their beloved and well cared for horses fed. In the past, I have on occasion, given away as gifts to friends, some excellent horses. In the current economy, very few folks would be in a position to accept such gifts. It is also easy to say, 'don't breed so many.' Problem is, it is the responsible breeders of quality horses who are cutting back. This means that overall herd quality will be reduced, meaning more low-quality (poor tempered, badly conformed) horses for whom there is little demand. Those animals still deserve to be cared for humanely and yet may end up starving or being shipped to Mexico. Furthermore, I am worried about the ramifications for the rest of the agriculture industry, because now that regulated horse slaughter is unavailable, I foresee activists stopping food stock slaughter.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Bec Location: Illinois on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:38 AM

Can you say STOP Breeding? Duh, "oversupply", low prices, but breed anyway. The same people with cell phones and the latest gadgets can't come up money to euthanize an ailing animal? Puppy mill, pony/horse mill - they amount to people wanting a quick buck with little or no work. Horse traders are the only ones wanting slaughter, and they are outnumbered by people appalled at this phony industry.
[ Report Abuse ]
  • Page: