Contact Webmaster ·  Station Info ·  What's on TV
Home  ·   Weather  ·   News  ·   Morning Show  ·   Sports  ·   TV Station  ·   Contests  ·   Local  ·   Features  ·   Blogs  ·   Epros
Classifieds · Your Pix & Flix · E-News · Schools · Stateline Jobs · Jobs @ WIFR · Obituaries · Money · Entertainment · Politics · Lottery · For Women Only · Digital TV Switch
Police DisputeWIFR Blog Listing
Police Dispute
Topic Author: Nichole Vrsansky
Posted: 6:47 PM Oct 23, 2007
Replies Posted: 55 comments
Save Email Print
 del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
Recent Blog Topics
NIU Shootings - Post your thought
Website Blog
Police Dispute
Niki's Blog on Gas Prices
Cheap Trick Blog
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Email (optional):
Location:
Enter Comments:  
   characters left
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.

Police Dispute

Right now there's a divide between the Rockford Police Union and it's chief, Chet Epperson.  The Police Union President recently wrote to the city and to the chief asking them to hold a public forum to sort out their differences. The city and the police chief said no, they would rather do that in private. We want to know what you think. Do you think a public forum is the best way to cure this estranged relationship? Do you think they can do it privately? Or no matter what they do it's not going to help?


Submitted by: LogDog November 7, 2007 12:40 PM
To; Angry Tax payer, Flower girl, and Violet, You three are very perceptive, in also noticing the "body language" of the Mayor and the Chief, as concerned citizens spoke at the city counsel meeting. Their tacit response was clearly this: "We don't care who you are, nor what you think, nor have to say, you are a nobody here, just get it over with"! This same message was also displayed by some of the counsel members, who do not wish to appear "Contrary" to the Mayor, because they don't have the fortitude to stand up for the public they are supposed to represent. All this is a lesson for us Tax payers, one to be recalled the next time we go to the polls to vote. WE SHALL REMIND THEM THEN, as they clearly won't listen now !

Log Dog,
or should I change it to Mad Dog ?
Submitted by: violet November 6, 2007 06:45 PM
I am disappointed in the chief and the mayor.
The first rule for being a good manager is to listen to the people that report to you.
Respect for your employee is crucial for a good working atmosphere. Apparently, that isn't happening here in Rockford, why?
Submitted by: FLOWERGIRL November 6, 2007 09:29 AM
I'm a citizen of rockford,not a police officer.I fine it very disturbing to me that when the public is speaking Epperson and Larry paid no attention.I have faith in the rockford police they are doing the right thing.Myabe Larry can't face the truth about his 2nd choice or will he live by the sword and die by the sword.To the union stay strong.
Submitted by: Angry tax payer November 6, 2007 07:53 AM
As a tax payer, a voter and a citizen of Rockford I was absolutely disgusted by the Mayor and Police Chief's behavior at city council last night! Hundreds of Rockfords finest, their families, citizens and other unions were there to support and speak on behalf of the union and the egregious manner in which this administration is treating the officers. Instead of listening to the speakers Morrissey and Epperson kept there heads down and paid ZERO attention to the speakers and showed a complete lack of respect! This type of behavior, although typical, should raise many concerns for the voters of Rockford. When two highly public officials can't even show the good grace to listen to the concerns of the public there is a huge problem with this administration! Mayor Morrissey, you showed your true colors and you are a disgrace to the office of mayor! Clearly, you are far too immature to hold the title of Mayor and come 2009 we will be shopping for a new one! I can promise you that! Mr. Epperson, you call yourself the publics chief and yet when the public speaks you turn a deaf ear? You, sir, are not fooling anyone! You are a disgrace to the uniform and the Rockford Police Department!

Submitted by: Retired November 2, 2007 12:08 PM
I am a retired Police Officer.
Why will I march?
I joined the department in the days the wages were so bad we were qualified for food stamps. I used old equipment and drove squads that were falling apart. Sometimes we would stop and pick up the pieces and continue to the call we were on. I paid for most of my uniforms. I learned from the “old-timers” how to catch crooks, how to protect citizens and property and each other. I swore an oath to protect and defend and I stuck to it.
I saw more in one year than most people would see in a lifetime. I saw crimes in progress, I saw children lying in the street broken and bloodied, and I was with people as they died, I saw citizens and other police officers dead in the streets from violence, and yet each day I returned to duty. I forgot what a holiday was or when they were because I was working the streets every day no matter what. A day off sometimes was a way to unwind unless I was sitting in a courtroom waiting to testify.
I knew I was doing the right thing when years later, people I had arrested would call me and ask advice about their families and children. My reward was in the smile people would get when their problem was solved, or those who offended them would be off the streets for many years. The toll for this career is heavy, premature aging, premature health problems, daily reminders of pain from old injuries, but ask any retired police officer if they would do it again and your answer would be “In a New York minute”.
We all did this while working within the rules set down by our government, agreed to by our administrations, negotiated by our unions.
Now the wages, training, and equipment are better, but in the final analysis, cops still go out, find crooks and put them in jail. That’s what it’s all about, protecting society and making things safe.
Now the mayor and the chief come out and say prior administrations were mediocre. This is a kick in the face to every prior Chief of Police, every Officer who ever served, or died in the line of duty. I watch them trot out “new” programs with slick names and spiffy charts. Are they new? Look close and its cops going to where the bad guys are. They are the same old tried and true methods that have been in use since Sir Robert Peel. I see a chief who has severed ties with every other police agency and cooperative effort, initiatives that have taken years to form, initiatives that work and were working. I’m seeing a chief and mayor who took a fine department that could almost run itself and turn it into something they thought they could micro-manage on a daily basis after cleaning house of almost all experience and dissention. Is this making Rockford safer or is this to make them look good? Do they follow the rules as they claim everybody else must? The same courts and justice system we all swore to protect and defend will decide that.
Another right, equally defended with honor and paid for in blood, is every citizen’s right to petition government for the redress of grievances. The marches to city hall are just that. Each lawsuit and each grievance filed is for redress on signed documents that spell out how things are to be done. In the case of contractual procedures, a daily thumbing of the nose at those procedures sets the stage for union-busting. This is a situation that no labor union will allow be it another police union local or any of the trades unions. Why? Because they might be next. I do not think the unions are scared of the mayor or chief, but they will defend their rights with honor and dignity. Nobody in the PB & PA Unit 6 has said they want to run the show, they only want fair treatment, they only want to do what they took an oath to do, protect and defend.
What’s the story? “I’m back, and I’m mad as hell”.
Submitted by: LogDog October 31, 2007 09:36 PM
Response to: "Tired of the negative police comments" Lady, I could not believe your writings. Obviously, you are so misinformed, or you are the type of person that will listen to, or watch a news clip, and take it to be Gosple. Lady, you need to become informed, and read other materials, and postings, and talk with those that are affected by this controversy. I, like you, was happily ignorant of what was going on with our city,and Police Department, until it became an issue that was too big to ignore. I did exactly what I suggested you do, and I formed a conclusive opinion, and it is this: The officers are absolutely correct in their stance against a chief that does not care about them, nor their welfare, and safety. I mean, a Chief who is doing exactly what a crooked, and corrupt Mayor acting in his own self interest,and gain, is directing him to do! This is precisely why he supports the Chief, and continues to make him look as if he were the best this city has ever had. Well, he can get the Chief to save 1.5 million dollars in over time, and juggle the statistics to look like crime is going down, but the bottom line is that it isn't! Ask yourself this: Do I really feel safer now than I did two years ago? If you don't, you've got your answer. If our Mayor was truly an honorable man, and really had the best interest of this city at heart,he would have terminated the Chief shortly after the "No Confidence" vote! I am so sorry I voted for Mayor Morrisey, and I fear when he fails to be reelected, he will take Chief Epperson down with him! This is a shame, as I believe that in the begining, Epperson wanted to do what was best for the Department, and the City as a whole, but he was side tracked by a Mayor who is not honorable! Take this as you will, but Lady, if you care, research what I have suggested, and if you still feel the same, then I salute you.

Concerned like you; LogDog
Submitted by: christa. merch October 30, 2007 07:03 PM
i happen to think that the police would be doing a better job , if your station wasnt intreviewing them on fridays which is the night with most crime , just cause you all live in nice nieghborhoods doesnt mean you can be part of the problem and not let everyone else get help
Submitted by: Retired 5-0 October 30, 2007 10:38 AM
I'm growing sick and tired of Chet's supporters claiming that there are only a few officers who are disgruntled. 98% of the police force do not trust and have NO CONFIDENCE in Epperson. That should speak volumes to this community! Instead of bashing the hard working men and women who protect your personal freedoms, you should all be thanking your lucky stars that any one of these officers would do whatever they had to, to protect you. Even if that meant taking a bullet! I worked with Epperson for years and I can assure you that he would never take a bullet for anyone! Epperson is a power hungry egomaniac with no moral compass whatsoever. He has made a career of lying to his superiors, violating citizens civil rights and hiding from true police work every chance he could. he has never worked a crime scene and has never been a detective. He was refused advancements because he could not handle the job. Now, as a second choice chief he is destroying the RCPD, commiting criminal acts, blackmailing his own command staff, bullying the rank and file and disparaging the good name that this department had before he took over. There will be no resolution to the union/city leader problems until Epperson gets his butt fired or thrown in jail.
Submitted by: scout October 30, 2007 10:17 AM
You are right, Tired in Rockford. The PB&PA and their families, friends and supporters will not let it go.

And yes, the police are fearful of losing their jobs if they don't give in to Epperson's intimidation tactics.

And, yeah, the Chief knows how to stroke the media, so there have been opportunities for Chet to give compliments to the officers when the cameras are running.

Too bad he cannot do the same inside the police department walls. Instead he is too busy trying to find out who is blogging about him and handing out internals to the best officers in his department and covering up for those he assisted in committing a felony.

And maybe you are afraid of your union leadership, but no one needed to strong arm the PB&PA membership to get the 276 votes.

However, Epperson had to threaten to fire his deputy chiefs if they didn't drop out of the union.

If you are so unhappy with your union, why don't you just resign? Seems like that is a better option for you than any that is available to the 276.

And do you really believe there would be a long, long line of dedicated, educated and experienced officers that are dying to work in the toxic, unsafe environment that is the RCPD under Chester.

Why don't you apply--sounds like you might enjoy getting beat up everyday by your boss...no matter what!

So, the PB&PA and all their supporters will not let this go until Epperson is gone. No one is making you read these blogs, so I suggest that you just go away as well.
Submitted by: tired of the negative police comments October 29, 2007 05:47 PM
EVERYONE except a few who will not LET IT GO are tired of the whiners. Chief Epperson has more class than some of the police and their family members and friends who have written childish comments on the 276 to 6 blogs, You are the ones who are fearful.I have heard the Chief numerous times respect and support his officers. He is your boss and no matter what he has been appointed and makes the decisions. Go somewhere else if you can't handle his decisions. I am a union member and I have seen in my 34 years just how unions act and behave and intimidate their members to vote behind closed doors and I know that many members are afraid of their own union members. Maybe those who can't handle it should RESIGN and go to any other department,Rockford will find more dedicated, working officers. BYE!
Submitted by: wild world October 28, 2007 03:48 PM
Demote the chief back to patrol. Hire a woman as the chief !!!!!!!
Submitted by: annamos October 27, 2007 06:30 PM
I think that they should do it privetly.
Submitted by: scout October 27, 2007 12:48 PM
Nice story in Saturday's Rockford Register Star about the PB&PA president, Aurelio DeLaRosa.
Submitted by: Bewildered October 25, 2007 11:53 PM
Is it not puzzling to the Citizens that every night you turn your t-v on and Chief Epperson touts some Grand Plan and fails on a daily basis to recognize his Officers. Does it not make you wonder why Mayor Morrissey and Chief Epperson both sought public dissention towards everyday Police Officers by making damning statements and releasing sensitive information about an on-going investigation, then basically slandered Officers to the Public in a Pre-Trial Publicity Stunt meant to give their views favoritism ?

Now he refuses to meet , he cant go anywhere without the Mayor and Patrick Hayes speaking for him. I'm bewildered as Chief Epperson said regarding his vote of No Confidence

What is the Chief and Mayor afraid of That Their Lies will come OUT ?
Submitted by: Ex Cop October 25, 2007 09:21 PM
citizens should go to police union blog site at "276to6part2" and read some of the postings if you want to see whats really going on.
Submitted by: LionKing October 25, 2007 06:26 PM
I cannot understand why the Chief and Mayor would be afraid to meet the Union in a public setting. It does seem like there must be something they are hiding. At they very least they should allow a debate between the two signs and arbitrate the issues. I don't see how a board chosen by the Mayor can be fair.
Submitted by: GOLDENBOY October 25, 2007 06:05 PM
IT'S TIME FOR EPPERSON TO FACE THE PUBLIC.WHAT IS THIS MAN DOING TO THIS FINE POLICE DEPT.
Submitted by: parrothead October 25, 2007 04:11 PM
I agree with all the above comments......they are all accurate and true. WIFR why don't YOU start asking some hard questions of Epperson and Morrissey!!
Submitted by: Willie Montanez October 25, 2007 04:05 PM
276 Rockford police officers cast a vote of no confidence in Chet Epperson’s leadership. Officers and their family members then marched for fairness to city hall. Now, union leadership wants to sit down with the Mayor and Police Chief in a semi-public forum and discuss their differences with the media present. Morrissey and Epperson refused. I want to know what our municipal leaders have to fear from this meeting.
I cannot fathom why the party line from the Chief to the Mayor to the City Legal Department is that the rank and file are malcontents only motivated by their lack of a contract. I am deeply offended at the way the union has been publicly disparaged and ignored. The Police Chief has alienated his rank and file and in doing so he has compromised the public trust in the department. The public has a right to know what caused 98% of the police department to express no confidence in the Chief. I believe the vote is direct result of failed leadership. Epperson’s style - rule with an iron fist and motivate by fear - has destroyed the morale of the department. A lack of vision and guidance - not greed- led to the no confidence vote. The union has clearly delineated their grievances and concerns. It is time for Mayor Morrissey and Chief Epperson to show true leadership and meet with the union to discuss issues that directly effect the community. The union has stated that manpower shortages have led to fewer officers being able to adequately patrol areas of the city. They have provided data to support that claim. All Epperson says is “not true.” Where are his precious statistics proving that isn’t true. All he has to do is show up at a meeting and refute the union’s claims. If he is right and the crybabies are wrong then why hide from a debate. Come on Chief, show your face and back up your terse non-committal denials with empirical data. I thought that’s why you got a Masters Degree. Prove to the public your policies and initiatives work. Hiding only fuels speculation that crime statistics have been manipulated into deceiving the public into thinking crime is down. I read the paper every day and in my eyes crime isn’t down at all. But what do I know. Epperson is the Chief of Police and as such he should stand in front and meet his detractors head on. Instead he is hiding. Does he fear objective, critical scrutiny of his theories of policing? That is the only logical conclusion to be drawn from his refusal to meet with the union.
Submitted by: LogDog ; an alarmed citizen October 25, 2007 03:34 PM
I have been reading the posts by Rockford Police Officers, both on the old site, and the new one, which is... 276to6part2.blogspot.com ...
and have talked with several cops that would talk; I have come to this conclusion: This dispute is NOT about the unsettled CONTRACT, as we have heard the Mayor say on the radio. It is about not having enough cops on the streets during thier patrol shifts. this is due to the special projects the Chief has initiated, which takes away manpower from the patrol shifts! It is also about inadequate equipment, and lack of police radio communications! The cops cannot get back-up if they need it, nor can they call for help! This creates UNSAFE work conditions. Now, add to this their grievances against the Chief's unfair practices, and the lack of interest on the part of the Mayor of this city. Top this off with the fact that they are gagged, and cannot speak out to the public, and we have a combination that will not be easily resolved.
Submitted by: Old Salt October 25, 2007 03:28 PM
I've worked for the Rockford Police Department for a great many years and have always been proud to wear the badge. That is until Mr. Chester Epperson became chief! In all my years I have never seen a department fall so fast. Morale is at an all time low, officers are afraid of losing their jobs for actually doing their jobs. Patrol shifts are running shorter and shorter, equipment is failing and injuries sure seem to be up. I'm afraid it's going to take the death of one of our own to wake up the people of Rockford. I don't think there is any hope for Epperson and Morrissey, though. They have their own agenda's and I can assure you that it doesnt have anything to do with what is decent, moral or even legal. When the chief of police decides it's okay to go after young officers with families and children for posting a few comments and then allow other officers to commit serious crimes and then cover it up...that says alot about what the RPD has become! I got alot of respect for the union for requesting a public meeting but Epperson will never agree to it. The best that can happen is that Epperson will resign or the board will grow a backbone and fire him! Either option works just fine with me!
Submitted by: Retired Civie October 25, 2007 02:57 PM
Yes, for sure the union, Chief and imaprtial party/ies should meet to get the truth out to the community. If the Chief has threatened Officers if they speak out....Seems one could follow the chain of events occurring when an Officer does speak to the community and then is subjected to repercussions. The community needs to learn the TRUTH! WHat is happening at RPD is inexcusable!
Submitted by: Frosty October 25, 2007 02:13 PM
I don't have a problem with matters being settled behind closed doors. As a citizen, I don't feel as though I need to know all of the personnel matters - from the Chief on down. After a vote of no-confidence, is it possible for Chief Epperson and those who work with and/for him to get back to normal? I think so as long as all involved behave like grown-ups and stick to the issues at hand. Nothing will be solved by flinging insults, calling names, bringing up the past, and threats -- this applies to both sides involved. Let's get past this nonsense and get back to business!
Submitted by: Realbluesteel October 25, 2007 01:43 PM
In its simplest form, the issue about hashing things out in a public forum comes down to this: Epperson has said publicly that he would meet with union members anytime and anywhere. So the union leadership requests a meeting, in public, and Epperson turns them down. Now, does that sound like an executive who says what he means and means what he says? Or one who is willing to go the extra mile to solve the current problem?

Believe me, I'm aware there are lots of other problems between the union and Epperson (I can't bring myself to address him as "Chief"). But it's not about the lack of a contract, as Epperson and Morrissey claim. They are using the contract issue as a reason to deny a meeting with the union to iron out the other problems.

So, Rockford, what or who is Epperson hiding from? Maybe WIFR should do a little investigative reporting and try to find out.
Submitted by: Concerned Citizen October 25, 2007 12:44 PM
The chief and the mayor should have no problem attending a public forum with the union, unless they are hiding something! The public has a right to be informed about this matter!
Submitted by: scout October 25, 2007 11:06 AM
Epperson and Morrissey have used the local press to spin their stories about issues in the Rockford Police Department that should have been dealt with internally. They have blown small infractions by some personnel out of proportion. Epperson has used coercion with others by threatening to go public with charges that twist the truth.

The Rockford public only is hearing the administration's side of the story.

The police department personnel have been threatened by Epperson to not comment about these issues in the press or they will lose their jobs.

The police union asked to have a semi-public meeting to resolve some issues, because they want the public to know the truth. The union has nothing to hide. They do know they cannot trust Epperson.

Epperson has much to hide, so there will be no meetings. He and Morrissey do not want the truth to come out.

There are very good reasons for the No Confidence vote. 98 percent of the Rockford police force has no confidence in Epperson's abilities to resolve this dispute.

Epperson should resign his position.
Submitted by: Strawberry Shortcake October 25, 2007 07:31 AM
Mr. Epperson has continually said that he will meet at any place and time to discuss the issues. He has also repeatedly said that his door is open for communication. Then why won't he meet openly and honestly as the union has requested? I find that to be a little unsettling. It seems to me that he has something to hide and that is very concerning. He also keeps saying that the police matters are private and should be discussed outside of the media glare. Then why did Mr. Epperson so brazenly take internal investigations of officers to the media? Why has he and Mr. Morrissey spoken opening about these investigations and about unproven allegations against officers? It is my understanding that the most recent investigations surrounding officers blogging was a very minor violation of department policy. I suspect Mr. Epperson thought he could rule by intimidation. Now that he sees those tactics aren't working, he wants to pull away from the media spotlight.

For the safety of the union board and all the officers I think the only way to resolve anything is through open discussion in a public setting! However, it seems to me that Mr. Epperson has caused so much damage I don't think it can ever be repaired as long as he is the chief of police. If he cares about the department and the city, he should do the right thing and resign!
Submitted by: sirwil October 24, 2007 05:32 PM
I think that it is time for chief Epperson to face the facts,He is not respected by the police officers he is suppose to lead nor does he have the support of the union, and the reason is clear, HE IS NOT QUALIFIED..
Power went to his head and he has no idea how to be a leader he thinks of himself as the supreme ruler not the puplic servent he is suppose to be.
Submitted by: Concerned Citizen October 24, 2007 01:39 PM
I think the Chief and the Mayor should join the union in a public forum, unless they have something to hide!
The taxpayers of Rockford deserve to be informed on this very important issue between the two sides!
Read Comments
Posted by: hannah Location: freeport il
dr.divoky is really men she almost made me go to jail dr.d no best yall need 2 fire her asap

Posted by: ann Location: byron
i am glad i do not live in rockford, and while I do agree with the "you cannot pick your boss" statement I also believe that a boss should treat his employees with respect. this is not a dictatorship. in my work I deal with alot of rockford officers and they are out there doing their jobs dispite the treatment to them. bravo to the officers

Posted by: Rodney B. Sorkin Location: Rockford
The Chief and the Mayor are trying to institute change without a clear reason or mandate to do so. They should back off and let the police morale recover.

Posted by: Jeff Location: Rockford
The chief is being investigated for criminal behavior. WIFR, do you really think it's appropriate to have him doing a PSA under the circumstances? It only takes away your credibility as a media source and makes the city look bad to outsiders.

Posted by: Cuffup75 Location: Rockford
I have nothing but the highest respect for you officers. I work in loss prevention and I get to work with a lot of you on a daily basics. It does suck for you officers. I would not feel safe either. Sometimes on my side of town there is only 2 officers working. Yeah! That's real safe! I know when you officers are on a call sometimes Dispatch will send a officer from the west-side to the east-side. That makes it dangers for everyone. Sometimes my shoplifters like to fight and if the 2 officers are tied up on another call it takes awhile for another one to show up. Thanks Chief!! I love wondering if someone is going to be there. Oh! I take that back. I know they will be there after they get pulled from another area. That means their area is open right? That's smart. Like I said, I know sometimes it takes you officers awhile to get to me, but I understand. Keep up the good work. I'm with you all the way. I just have one question. Does the Chief really know what you officers go through?

Posted by: Jacquelin Location: Rockford
Everyone has to be under someone's authority. To not be under someone's authority is called rebellion. Remember the story of the country that wanted a new king, the people demanded a new king.. What is the difference of what the Police Union is doing?

Posted by: Jerry Location: Rockford
The whole dispute is about MONEY. Money from additional officers that the mayor does nopt want to spend. The Mayor has his pet projects that if he spent more more on increasing the number of officers would not allow him to complete his pet projects. Which is more important, a riverwalk or public safety? The mayor has told the chief, "You do what you have to do with what you have, and I'll stand behind you". Your seeing the making of a one term mayor, happening.

Posted by: jay Please read the post on 276to6part3.blogspot.com regarding the overtime, 1993 survey that resulted in the shift to 10 hrs patrol shifts, and what the union gave up/city won at that time. it is very inciteful and extremely accurate. as stated, it can be verified by Jeff Morris, now chief of police who was mainly responsible for implementation of it.

Posted by: me anyway merry CHRISTMAS to all.love you

Posted by: me to you tax payers. as long as drugs and the link card is available. good luck.tryied for the fist time in my life to get a little help cause of my mother has cancer. was laid of for 6 weeks . my wife is a waitress. was denied.guess i need 4 kids to get help.oh well im back to work thank goodness. love mom@dad

Posted by: Joseph Location: Rockford
I'd be curious to know where our chief of police has been when all this crime is going on? The man has time to Christmas carole with some over zealous, self proclaimed activist but where is he when elderly people are being robbed? This man doesnt have a clue and if he really cared about the city he would resign. I guess arrogance will be his downfall.

Posted by: Marsha Location: Rockford
Rockford has one of the highest crime rates in the state - and police officers who are focused on getting rid of the chief. The union wants to do things the way they always have - and resent Epperson's efforts to do things a new way. If you look at the crime stats - it's obvious the old way didn't work. Possibly we need new policemen, not a new chief.

Posted by: Rhonda Location: Rockford
It is a shame that so much time money and effort is going into this situation. If Chief Epperson really cared about the citizens of Rockford he should gracefully leave or retire. We have much more worthy issues in this city that we should be focusing on. Let it go Epperson.

Posted by: Deb Location: Rockford
I read all these postings and just was wondering where this world is going. We don't stand behind the majority any more. Is there no unity in this town. So most of you are saying just put up with it or quit and go somewhere else (thats nice). I wouldn't want to be a Chief if no one had confidence in me. I agree with the union and can't figure out where half of you people think this town should put up with a chief like Epperson. Just sit and think about unity and what right we already have to give up in everyday things. Think Think Think

Posted by: Carrie Location: Rockford
I feel like the police officers are acting like babies. If they can't settle their own dispute then how can they handle their job with the public. Chiefs are known to be somewhat tough or stern. They should be. You don't want some whimp in charge. I think the officers should find another job if they can't handle things.

Posted by: Karen Location: Roscoe
Do you cherry pick the e-mails you show on the 5:30 news cast. I have not seen one e-mail defending the police officers of Rockford. Out of 140,00 people,it's hard for me to believe the whole city is for the mayor & chief. There is more to this story than just the discipline of officers. It's working without a contract for going on two years (but money to renovate the metro center & buy a hockey team), officers on the streets taking calls without backup, not enought officers to patrol the street, I could go on and on. Rockford wake up, your city officials are pulling the wool over your eyes.

Posted by: Jan Location: Harlem Blvd
If this chief spent even half of his time doing real police work instead of trying to get good camera angles, eavesdropping on citizens, stroking the egos of psychotic activists, manipulating stats, stealing money from the city for his own foolish pursuits and perjuring himself-maybe he would stand a chance. Instead he does exactly the opposite of what a good chief would do. This city had two murders this weekend and where was the chief? Chief Iasparro was always on the scene when a crime happened and was always willing to address the public, kept his officers in line and made this community a safer place! Why should I have to pay the salary of a pathetic, arrogant weakling? This city needs a real cop with real solutions-not some text book idiot who has no clue what police work is!

Posted by: tax payer Location: Rockford
Why is it the police need a union? If I spent even 1 hour looking at porn online I would be fired, or if I missed 40% of my scheduled days I would be fired. Would the police care? I believe this shouldn't be public and the officers being reprimanded shouldn't be supported by the union. Thanks Chief for taking a stand for what is right!

Posted by: Another tax payer Location: Rockford
If the police department spent more time patrolling our City and less time whining about the chief, we all would be beeter off. I've seen many officers use the law in their favor and am so sick of hearing how much you do for the people. Quit whining and do your job!

Posted by: Ed Location: Rockford
Regarding Mr. Del La Rosa's comment that "Officer Baily needs to be a hero to his family and this is how they reward him" is ridiculous and dangerous. Why should we "reward" someone for visiting porn sites on "company time". The union should be as concerned about his actions as the administration and the public.

Posted by: Labgirl Location: Beloit
You all are continually trying to get feedback from the chief on what is going on in your city and he won't fill you in. Doesn't that scare you about the city's future with him as a leader? When WIFR interviews him, he can't even look at the camera. He's hiding the truth and threatening the people of the department to keep quiet about what's going on behind closed doors. He won't listen to a word anyone is saying. There's obviously no way to resolve this situation so demand that he been relieved of his duties and get someone in there that you can look to as a leader of a high-crime city that needs a great deal of leadership. It's ridiculous to watch everyday on this station as they go back and forth and get nothing resolved. Why they keep focusing on him as the chief is beyond me. He has made too many mistakes to be respected and why should we care what he has to say? You can't trust that a word he says is true, forget him!

Posted by: Jeanette Location: Rockford
I'm actually not all that upset about this ordeal with the Rockford Police Dept. After all, finally we can hear something else besides all of the criticism of the Rockford School System. Alot of residence really like our schools and would like someone in the news to take more notice of the hundreds of positives, instead of a few negatives.

Posted by: Anonymous I think the media has been too quick to report the Unions position. The media needs to point out the union rights under the CBA. The right to file grievances when the contract is violated. Unions do not manage the police dept. They are responsible for union business and the company's compliance with the CBA. Unions often try to run a company but they have no accountability if their demands fail. Management is responsible for the efficient running of the org. The Union can be a partner in change or resist change. To refuse to talk and walk out is unprofessional. If you want to be a part of the solution you have to part of the conversation. The Unions demand for the the resignation of the chief is premature. Where is the evidence? The media and the union have tried to discredit the chief in the media without proven facts. Makes good print but not fair. All of this negative reporting hurts the community and does not solve the problem. Let the facts determine the outcome.

Posted by: whats the real problem Location: 12/7/07
alright I am really sick and tired of this crap and subject and of Rockford people posting without thinking it all out!!!do you even see whats going on?? your police officers and union are throwing a fit over being disciplined and over morals right and wrong and you guys want to fight and post over the crime rate and other crap wrong with Rockford and the area hello the cops wont answer to whats right and wrong so how can crime be brought under control or even be addressed there is possibly pay offs or worse with this kind of bull crap going on in that kind of police force that will not answer for its wrongs that makes me wonder what else they are hiding sure are not upfront and doing there job or they would not be ashamed of the code of conduct and ways of behaving while on duty come on people get a clue you cannot clean a city up if you do not have good useful tools or tools that are broken!!! and Eppersons tools are very broken!!! out of line out of control look at the big PIC

Posted by: disabled this is sad and needs to end just shut up and get it over with the most unprofessional behavior on both sides I have ever seen and what just because they are union and they are police they can ask there boss to get lost I think not no one else in normal life can do that and expect to have a job the next day!!! this is what you call professionals protecting and serving you every day yea thats funny!!!

Posted by: waldo The chief needs to be forced to resign and that's the only solution !!!

Posted by: Deb Location: Rockford
Why is the cheif tell the press one thing and the union other things? Isn't this double talk? He needs to go before we lose our good police officers. thanks

Posted by: AmerikanEuro Part 2- Some where along the lines racism just has to come up. This form of Institutionalized Racism is grown old and always blaming someone who is Euro-American (Political Correctness for white for those uninformed) If the chief were black or hispanic would this be taking place, I think not. So stick to the issues and leave your racism at home.

Posted by: Amerikan Euro Location: Rockford
After reading all these post, some of you folks are kidding right? The snied comebacks and quite a few self righteous bloggers ( their right and mad as hell- yawn) I lived thru the same scenerio thats going on. This isn't about who side your on. I'm all for Law Enforcement. So ok Chief Epperson step down but in return I would like to have all the officers pictures on staff (No Names) mailed to registered voters and a vote of confidence be taken on the officers. I witnessed a crime in where the victim was taken to jail for his actions to stop the criminal and a small little female officers was expressing her opinions etc. The only reason no one said anything back was because she was female and the other male officers will defend the gender verses the professionalism most have. Since you wanted to put it out there for the public then Chief Epperson step down as long as we get to take a vote of confidence on the officers.

Posted by: sickofitalready! what employee can do the things that these police officers have done and still have a job? why don't the police oficers that are not happy simply leave? maybe all of the wrong doings by the officers themselves needs to be exposed and the public can then decide who they want protecting them. i've seen and heard some doosies by the police officers and find their behavior deplorable. leave your job if you are not happy and quit hiding behind the union. as a business owner, i would never allow an employee to get away with the total @#%^ these employees have gotten away with for years. of course if any previous high ranking officials admitted to what has been allowed to go on in that department would have to admit their own moral integrity or lack of. enough already! shut up, do your job and take home your paycheck. if you can't do an honest days work without hiding behind your union then leave. the union is just there to let you get away with all your wrong doings.

Posted by: Dan Location: Freeport
Posted by Bruce (demands" of their subordinates. To those who have yet to gain understanding of how reality is, try this: your next day at work go up to your boss and demand that he quit his job and let you take over his position) This is so true and sums up whats going on so well why because they are police does it make it any different than the rest of use throwing tantrums like kids and demanding there ways just because others have had a good spanking for acting up Man I am so happy I don't live in Rockford and am retired from police work and never worked for Rockford's department like I said so unprofessional and uncalled for like Bruce said we cant just walk up to our bosses and say F you go t well you get it why do they think they can and are different???

Posted by: Dan Location: Freeport
I am from another town and don't know the whole story!! But this whole thing has gotten way out of hand and Epperson Is not so bad as to deserve the crapload that he is getting this is just uncalled for unprofessional and way out of control!!!I am so happy I do not live in a city where the cops are that out of hand that when they are disciplined that they all revolt against the head bunch of crap!!! If he was doing unprofessional stuff on duty the cop deserves to loose his job and the female officer if she was never on duty and always using sick time not at all professional or wanting her job both deserve there punishment now this crap should end it shows how unprofessional and how the whole department needs looking at or replaced!!!!

Posted by: marie martha Location: rockford
NOBODY GETS TO PICK YOUR BOSS DO THEY? CHIEF EPPERSON WAS APPOINTED BY THE FIRE AND POLICE BOARD BASED ON HIS EDUCATION,INTEGERITY AND EDUCATION. POLICE STRATEGIES HAVE TO CHANGE TO MAKE THIS CITY A BETTER PLACE! IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE PAST, THIS DID NOT HAPPEN WITH SUCH A REDUCTION IN CRIME AS CHIEF EPPERSON HAS DONE. HE IS NOT THERE TO BE YOUR"FRIENDS". ARE YOU HAVING TO ACTUALLY WORK INSTEAD OF SLACKING YOUR WAYS IN THE PAST. YOU DO NOT GET TO SAY WHO YOUR BOSS IS GOING TO BE. I PERSONNALY SAW BRUCE BRANHAM SLEEPING IN HIS POLICE CAR IN A WALMART PARKING LOT DURING THE DAY! I HAD TO BEEP TWICE AT A VERY CLOSE DISTANCE, BEFORE HE WOKE UP. WHY SHOULD HE BE PAID FOR LITERALLY "SLEEPING ON THE JOB" DO YOUR JOB AND GET OVER IT. YOUR CHIEF IS A LEADER AND YOU HAVE A FALLEN BEHIND SO MUCH IN THE PAST, YOU ARE RESISTING TO CHANGE TO MAKE THE CITY A BETTER PLACE. HE HAS NOT BEEN FAIRLY TREATED BY THE DEPARTMENT, BECAUSE THE UNION HAS BROW BEAT THE OFFICERS SO THIER VISION HAS BEEN CLOUDED!

Posted by: LaVonn Location: SW Rockford
I would like to applaud the union for standing firm in thier ethics and morals by asking Chief Epperson to resign. There is no place in this city for corrupt leadership. I am a black woman and I don't think this city needs a chief that is racist and only uses black leaders when it is to his advantage. I'm ashamed of our black leaders for buying into Chief Eppersons rhetoric. I'm also deeply troubled that a black woman would be fired for her pregnancies and on the job injuries. Officer Bailey made some mistakes but it sounds to me like the city is trying to go after him because he made comments about the chief and mayor. Everyone deserves a second chance and for those who seem to think any officer deserve to be fired for making a mistake that was not a crime: I will remind you-judge not, lest you be judged yourself. The mayor said Jim Ryan deserved a second chance and he could have killed someone. Why would these officers not deserve the same?

Posted by: Larry Location: Rockford
I support Chief Epperson. I am appalled that the police union supports a member who views pornography on his employer's computer. I am appalled that 276 police officers feel that they are above the law on this issue. Chief Epperson is right to hold police officers accountable on this issue and other issues needing disciplinary action. The police union and its supporters should be ashamed of thier lack of morals and above the law attitude.

Posted by: Liz Location: Rockford
I think the police union should stop acting like spoiled brats and sit down with the police chief and work this out. You don't get to pick your boss. So stop the whining and work this out. Both sides need to meet and get it done.

Posted by: Annie Location: Loves Park, IL
I would like to ask the police chief a couple questions. Would you like the people of Rockford to allow you a chance to get your changes made? Do you feel the resistance you are getting is because people have a hard time with change?

Posted by: Chuck Location: Rockford
Since WIFR is allowing Epperson "air" time, is WIFR also going to allow equal time to the police union?

Posted by: waldo They should find a new chief of police. The current chief should be forced to resign. Also, can't wait till the mayor's term is up !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Dixie Location: Rockford
I do feel that the public should know what the problem is with the police and their union and the Chief, I feel the citizens of Rockford have a right to know what the problems are, we pay all of their salaries and we should not be kept in the dark about things that effect our safety. What possible reason could there be for meetings held in secret. There has been talk of dirty laundry, when you are a public official, you should take great care that the dirty laundry is kept to a minimum.

Posted by: Maria Location: SW Rockford
I am sick and tired of watching this man on my tv everynight when he should be doing his job. Crime is getting worse and worse in my area and I worry about my grandchildren! He is giving the people nothing! He talks and talks but says nothing while inncocent people are being killed all over this city. But unless you are willing to publically support him with signs and banners and going on the news on his behalf he doesnt care about you! Things were better in my neighbrohood when Mr. Isparro was still the chief!

Posted by: Anonymous The past, of the Rockford Police Dept. has had a very military training officer by the name of Stan Stone ( Ex Marine DI ) Retired Rkfd Pd .If some of the officers are military minded or had military in past, then they the military minded officers would understand Chiefs Eppersons move for respect and Morals For those officers are not military minded brush up on your skills for chain of command Military style, because this is how chief Epperson is.

Posted by: Marcus Location: RKFD
I find it interesting that the chief of police has time to go on the news on an almost daily basis just to tell us what a great job he is doing. Interesting how he is never on the news when a murder or another armed robbery occurs. Just where are his priorities? I've never seen another chief spend so little time doing police work and so much time stroking their own ego. Get him out of there and let the police officers get back to real police work!

Posted by: Diane If epperson is so concerned about the saftey of officer's at the front desk than why are there officer's on light duty working there and expected to do the job of a reuglar officer. epperson doesn't seem to know that the people of rockford are fed up with his policies.

Posted by: Bruce Location: Rockford area
I am pleased to see that commitment and integrity are alive. Thank you Chief Epperson, and mayor Morrissey for standing your given ground, even in spite of the numbers of foolish people who think that those in authority should pander to the "demands" of their subordinants. To those who have yet to gain understanding of how reality is, try this: your next day at work go up to your boss and demand that he quit his job and let you take over his position. PLEASE- DO SEND AN E-MAIL to TV23 to let us all know of your uuu, mmm success. PS. originally I was not in favor of C. Epperson for chief, however he has proven to be quite worthy. Keep on Keeping on chief.

Posted by: Scott Location: Rockford
I believe that the chief of police is doing a fine job. If all the officers want to wine like babies, then maybe they need to look into a different line of work. New ideas and change are never easy. However, if we are going to change this city, then we ALL have to be ready for hard times. Community policing WILL pay dividends, but will cost hard work for sometime to come. I am very pleased with our mayor to continue to stand by our police leader, and not to give into union pressure. This union apparently does not want change, or for the city to become a safer place for people to come home. Mayor and chief, please press on and keep up the great work. You both have my full support, and I know that your efforts will pay off and that Rockford will become the greatest city in the great state of Illinois!

Posted by: Nick Location: rockford
The Register Star ran an article indicating that crime in all of Winnebago County was up by 6.7% last year. 2/3 of that crime originates in Rockford. Yet, Chief Epperson publicly stated that crime in the city of Rockford was down by 24% in 2006. There is an obvious discrepancy there! I can't believe the Rockford news media isn't asking hard questions. It appears as though we have all been misled! Either the FBI is incorrect, or Chief Epperson is flat-out lying about crime in Rockford. With the news of violence almost every night, I think I now know who to believe! It sounds as though maybe we should listen more closely to the rank and file police officers!

Posted by: Anonymous Our city staff IS BAD! What else more can I say? I just love how we pay our taxes and they can't even protect our streets anymore. The Mayor is bad, my alderman IS BAD (Jacobson) and I can't wait till next year when I move out of Winnebago county!!!!!

Posted by: Richard Location: Rockford
The more I think about all the publicity that is being created about the Chief by the union from the media, I have to ask myself what is the matter with this city. Why do you people listen to a bunch of rabble rousers that only want to make their life a bowl of cherries instead of doing their job the way they should. Why don't you all take a long look at officer Delarosa. His family history with unions is not all that good. One family member managed to aleinate the union with the company so bad that they moved out of Rockford and a lot of good people lost their jobs. I think that the union would just love it if they had no controls set on them by the Chief. Then they can drive like maniacs, insult the public, sit in the doughnut shops and laugh at all the pitiful citizens who need their help. Stop all the nonsense and do your job is what I say. My sister and brother-in-law all served our county law enforcement for a total of 45 years and they agree with the Chief.

Posted by: Don Location: Winnebago
If you compared this to privateindustry, would you see the union local asking for the resignation of the company CEO? The police union has to realize the police chief is just that if there are things they don't like, they can go to work for some other city police department.

Posted by: Richard Location: Rockford
I am so tired of listening to the poor police officers comments. Like Brannum saying that the officers need more time between calls so they can communicate. Maybe we should ask all criminals and accidents to schedule their occurances so the officers can communicate instead of doing their jobs. Also from the jist I get most of the BLUE LINE is pissed off because the Chief is disciplining them for their professional and personal conduct. This was always pushed under the table by the previous Chiefs because they believed in the BLUE LINE. I for one find it refreshing that we have someone who is doing their job and holding the police officers accountable for their actions. I hope that Epperson is our Chief for the next forty years.

Posted by: Sharon Location: Rockford
This is getting way out of hand. This Police despute sure isn't helping the people. I've seen first hand how the police use that to do what we'd get a ticket, or taken to jail for. I've seen so much of this, as I'm sure most people have. It's to bad that the Cheif can't fire the police, and replace them. Not all of them are corupt, but there are many. They think that because they are Police, they are above the law. What about the police officer that was so mad, because they busted a ubderage drinking party, and his son was taken in, instead of letting him go? I commend that officer for treating him like the rest. This is just 1 instance, but there are many that have been going on through the years. I've been behind police, and they are driving way over the speed limit. They are just crusing, as I've seen them pull into a place and eat, or get coffee. If I'd been driving that fast, I'd have gotten a ticket. I Don't think our Mayor should be in office. He should resign.

Posted by: Anonymous I work for a law enforcement agency near Rockford. Respect for the rank and file officers by management does not exist in the Rockford PD nor at the department I work for. After over a decade of experience in law enforcement, my observations are that most people in management positions within law enforcement have no management or people skills. Many were brought into management positions because they either had more time in service than others, or more often then not, they were “yes men” for their sheriff’s or chiefs. The sheriff’s and chiefs control the line of communication to the public, and the public only hears what management wants them to hear. If you speak up, you will be retaliated against. They rule by fear and intimidation. There needs to be more accountability against managers from outside the department so that concerns can be voiced without fear of retaliation. I beleive that at this point, a public forum is the only fair way to go.

Posted by: FLOWEGIRL I just watched 23 noon news.Are you out of your mind Chet investigating more officers? Don't think for one minute the people of Rockford don't know what you are doing.You might have the mayor on your side for now,it can't last much longer 2009 is on it's way